top of page

The Mutual Responsibility is Missing

The essence of a mutual responsibility approach is that it will take the whole of society working in concert to achieve change. And in the context of a reimagined safety net, mutual responsibility has two primary players: Society and the Individual. The role of society is to collectively support the conditions needed to grow people beyond vulnerability to reduce their dependence on public support. On the other hand, each person’s role is to be ultimately responsible for their future by being a participant in their own well-being and ability to be a positive contributor to their community.

​

The word “responsibility” means the ability to take control and respond to circumstances occurring in life. Mutual responsibility is a recognition that all persons have networks of friends and organizations that support them and come alongside them as they operationalize their individual responsibility. Systems and friends either work or don’t work to inspire and equip individuals to exercise individual responsibility. Good systems lead to people taking responsibility in ways that align with the intended outcomes of the system. A mutual responsibility system is capable of brokering services from crisis intervention to stabilization to readiness for the workforce to work placement and finally advancement into jobs that generate economic security and bring fulfillment to the individual.

PAS Graphics (18).png

People take more responsibility when they are accountable to others. From the heads of government to CEOs of major corporations to caseworkers on the front line and eventually to those trying to get out of poverty, accountability is a major source of motivation to achieve goals. In the same way a society should be accountable to its citizens to do all it can to facilitate opportunity for growth, progress, and advancement, while individuals are responsible and accountable for taking advantage of the opportunities when provided.

The goals of a poverty management system are to deliver a certain number of units of services, subsidies, and/or additional "items" to meet the goals of their funders. The organization is obligated to, first and foremost, keep the lights on to provide for the “poor.” This is not being accountable to the “poor”. Rather it is demeaning and stifling. On the other hand, if funding sources require that services, subsidies, and/or additional items contribute to a plan for getting people out of poverty and into economic stability, then organizations and systems will not only be acting responsibly but also will be showing accountability to those who should receive every opportunity possible to succeed. This is mutual responsibility in a poverty alleviation system.

​

When funding sources reward concrete progress made in long-term plans to increase household incomes up to an economic self-sufficiency level, such as 225% or more of the federal poverty guidelines, then mutual responsibility shifts from survival at all costs to stability. Individuals no longer feel the need to game the system to make ends meet, and organizations no longer feel the need to focus on short-term inputs to keep the doors open. Both parties can establish mutual accountability for a long-term plan out of poverty.

Societal Role in Mutual Responsibility

Society, encompassing governmental and non-governmental organizations, communities, and businesses, plays a pivotal role by creating an environment conducive to growth and stability. This includes:

  • Developing Infrastructure: Ensuring access to essential services such as healthcare, education, and transportation. For instance, studies have shown that access to quality education significantly reduces poverty by equipping individuals with the skills needed for better-paying jobs.

  • Implementing Inclusive Policies: Policies that promote inclusivity and equal opportunities for all, irrespective of background, are fundamental. The World Bank highlights that inclusive economic growth is key to reducing poverty and building shared prosperity.

  • Supporting Innovation in Public Programs: Encouraging innovative approaches to public assistance programs can lead to more effective poverty alleviation. For example, the "Housing First" model addresses homelessness by providing permanent housing as a first step, showing significant long-term benefits in various studies.Individual

 

Responsibility within the Mutual System

On the individual level, responsibility entails actively engaging in opportunities for self-improvement and community contribution. This includes:

  • Skill Development and Education: Engaging in available educational and skill-building opportunities to enhance employability and income potential. Data shows that individuals with higher education levels have lower unemployment rates and higher earnings.

  • Participation in Community and Support Networks: Leveraging local support networks and community programs can provide both resources and a sense of accountability, which are critical for sustainable progress.

  • Adopting a Forward-Thinking Mindset: Embracing a mindset focused on long-term goals rather than immediate survival can foster personal growth and economic stability.

​

Accountability and Motivation

Mutual responsibility thrives on accountability. This means:

  • Transparent and Accountable Governance: Governments and organizations must be transparent in their efforts to alleviate poverty, providing clear metrics on program success and areas for improvement.

  • Creating a Culture of Accountability: Encouraging a culture where both individuals and institutions are accountable for their progress can significantly motivate efforts towards poverty alleviation. For instance, microfinance institutions often use group lending models that leverage peer accountability to ensure loan repayment and business success.

 

Funding and Resource Allocation

Effective poverty management systems prioritize long-term stability over short-term relief. This involves:

  • Outcome-Based Funding: Shifting funding models to reward long-term outcomes, such as increased household incomes and sustained employment, rather than short-term outputs. This encourages programs to focus on meaningful, lasting impact.

  • Investing in Capacity Building: Allocating resources towards building the capacities of individuals and communities to achieve self-sufficiency. For example, programs that provide entrepreneurship training and startup capital have shown promise in elevating individuals out of poverty.

 

The essence of mutual responsibility in poverty alleviation lies in recognizing that both societal support and individual effort are indispensable. By fostering an environment that promotes opportunity, accountability, and long-term planning, we can create a more effective and humane approach to reducing poverty. This approach not only addresses the immediate needs of those in poverty but also empowers them to achieve lasting economic stability and fulfillment, thereby contributing to the overall prosperity of society.

bottom of page