All Articles
Policy

The 80-Hour Threshold: How SNAP and Medicaid Work Requirements Converge on the Same Families

Luke Poulsen
Luke Poulsen
Principal Consultant, The Poverty Solution
·8 min read

A 58-year-old home health aide in a rural Tennessee county works 25 hours a week—roughly 100 hours a month. She qualifies for both SNAP and Medicaid. Under the new requirements, she meets the 80-hour threshold. But SNAP and Medicaid have different reporting systems, different verification processes, and different caseworkers. Her hours count if she reports them correctly to both agencies. If her paperwork reaches one but not the other, she loses coverage from the program that didn't receive it—not because she stopped working, but because the systems don't talk to each other.

This is the convergence problem at the center of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's work requirement expansion. The law, signed July 4, 2025, simultaneously expanded work requirements across SNAP and Medicaid. Both programs now require 80 hours per month of qualifying activity. Both apply to overlapping populations. And in most states, they are administered by separate agencies with no shared reporting infrastructure.

What Changed in SNAP

The Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents (ABAWD) age range expanded from 18–54 to 18–64. The requirement now applies to adults with dependents aged 14 and older. Previous exemptions for veterans, individuals experiencing homelessness, and former foster youth have been narrowed or eliminated. States can only waive the requirement in areas where unemployment exceeds 10%—a threshold that excludes most rural counties despite limited local job markets.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates these changes will produce $187 billion in SNAP reductions over the next decade—the largest cut to the program ever enacted. In a typical month, 800,000 to 1 million adults ages 55–64 and 700,000 young adults are projected to lose some or all SNAP benefits.

What Changed in Medicaid

States must implement “community engagement” requirements by January 1, 2027. The threshold is the same: 80 hours per month of work, job training, education, or community service, documented and reported monthly. CBO projects 5.2 million people will lose Medicaid coverage by 2034, with 4.8 million becoming uninsured.

The overlap is the critical detail. Many of the individuals subject to SNAP work requirements are also Medicaid enrollees. They face the same 80-hour threshold from two programs, reported through two systems, verified by two agencies. The compliance burden is not additive—it is multiplicative.

80 hours per month of qualifying activity—documented and reported separately to SNAP and Medicaid, verified by different agencies, with different deadlines and different consequences for noncompliance.

The Arkansas Precedent

The clearest evidence for what happens when work requirements meet inadequate reporting infrastructure comes from Arkansas. When the state implemented Medicaid work reporting requirements, 18,000 adults—one in four of those subject to the requirement—lost coverage within seven months. A peer-reviewed study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found the requirement did not increase employment.

The people who lost coverage were not primarily refusing to work. They were working but could not navigate the online reporting portal, did not receive notices about the requirement, or had qualifying exemptions they could not document. The system selected for administrative capacity, not for effort.

That was one program in one state. The current expansion applies two programs nationwide, with converging deadlines and no federal mandate for states to build shared reporting systems.

The Coordination Gap

In most communities, a person subject to both requirements interacts with at least three agencies: a SNAP eligibility office, a Medicaid enrollment office, and a workforce development program (if they are using job training to meet the 80-hour threshold). Each maintains separate case files. A training hour logged with a workforce board may count toward SNAP compliance but not automatically appear in the Medicaid reporting system. A raise that satisfies the work requirement in one program may simultaneously trigger an eligibility cliff in another.

Community Action Agencies and other navigation organizations are the de facto coordination layer for families managing multiple programs. But most lack systems that track a single individual's hours, benefits, and compliance status across SNAP, Medicaid, and workforce programs in one place. The gap is not in the willingness to coordinate—it is in the infrastructure to do so.

The Timeline

SNAP work requirements are already in effect. The Medicaid community engagement mandate takes effect January 1, 2027. That gives states and community organizations roughly 10 months from the date of this writing to build or acquire the reporting and tracking infrastructure needed to prevent the Arkansas pattern from repeating at national scale.

The planning window is summer 2026. States that have not begun implementation planning by then face a compressed timeline that makes coordination failures more likely, not less. For reference, Arkansas had a 12-month implementation window and still produced a 25% coverage loss rate among affected enrollees.

What the Evidence Suggests

The Arkansas data is unambiguous on one point: work requirements without coordinated reporting infrastructure do not increase employment. They increase coverage loss. The question for the current expansion is whether the addition of a second simultaneous requirement (SNAP on top of Medicaid, or vice versa) compounds the administrative failure rate—and whether communities that invest in shared tracking systems can produce different results than Arkansas did.

The 12 states in APHSA's benefit cliff pilot network are testing some of these coordination models, but none have published results on dual-program compliance specifically. The evidence gap is significant. What is clear is that the systems most communities have today—parallel intake, siloed case files, program-by-program reporting—are the same systems that produced the Arkansas outcome.


Sources

  1. CBPP, “House Reconciliation Bill Proposes Deepest SNAP Cut in History” (2025)
  2. Urban Institute, “SNAP Cuts in One Big Beautiful Bill Act Leave Almost 3 Million Young Adults Vulnerable” (2025)
  3. KFF, “A Closer Look at the Work Requirement Provisions in the 2025 Federal Budget Reconciliation Law” (2025)
  4. Sommers et al., “Changes in Utilization and Health Among Medicaid Beneficiaries in Arkansas After Work Requirement Implementation,” New England Journal of Medicine (2019)
  5. USDA FNS, SNAP ABAWD Implementation Guidance under OBBB (2025)
  6. NACO, “USDA Issues Guidance on SNAP ABAWD Work Requirement Changes” (2025)
  7. APHSA, Benefit Cliff Dashboard—State Pilot Tracker (2026)

This analysis reflects policy as of February 2026. SNAP work requirements are in effect. Medicaid community engagement requirements must be implemented by January 1, 2027. State-level implementation details will vary.

Share this article