OhioSevere
Ranking 9 of 50 states and DC. The score is driven primarily by its economic vulnerability (94th percentile) and policy environment (67th percentile). 16% of the state's population — 1,843,277 people — earns in the income range where benefit phase-outs concentrate. Medicaid is the primary cliff driver. Each dimension below shows its component score, the underlying metrics, and how Ohio compares to all 50 states and DC.
A score of 78 means cliff conditions are more severe than in 78% of U.S. counties. State policy can shift the overall score by up to 25%. Even communities with low scores have families facing steep cliffs — the score measures how a place compares, not what any individual family experiences. Full methodology →
Population Exposure
How many people earn in the income range where benefit phase-outs concentrate — and who they are. 1,843,277 people in Ohio earn in the cliff zone — between 100% and 200% of the federal poverty level — where SNAP, Medicaid, childcare subsidies, and other major programs phase out.
Population by family type across income bands. Use the tabs to see how this splits by working status or program enrollment — families enrolled in more programs face steeper compound cliffs when income rises.
Cliff Severity
How steeply benefits drop when families earn more. The chart below shows the share of each additional dollar lost to benefit reductions and taxes at each wage level. When the line exceeds 100%, a raise leaves the family worse off. Medicaid creates the largest benefit loss at the cliff point in 100% of Ohio’s counties.
Rates are averaged over a $2.50/hr raise, matching the Upward Mobility Act’s proposed 50% cap. This chart uses Ohio’s program rules and local costs. Rates assume full program enrollment — most families are not enrolled in all programs simultaneously. Hover to see which programs drive each peak.
The Upward Mobility Act of 2026 uses this same measure — Marginal Effective Tax Rate — and proposes capping it at 50% for families receiving means-tested benefits.
Economic Vulnerability
Whether the local economy positions families where benefit phase-outs are most likely to trigger — and whether advancement is realistic. The chart below shows what cliff-zone industries actually pay, compared to what each family type needs to earn to clear benefit phase-outs.
Policy Environment
State policies that moderate or amplify cliff severity. Each sub-score runs 0 to 100 — lower means the state does more to mitigate cliffs in that area. The four combine into a multiplier that shifts the overall CLIFF Score by up to 25%. Same for all counties in a state.
Ohio has taken 6 policy actions addressing benefit cliffs across 2 legislative periods.
2022-2023
- Began testing TANF applicants who have not received benefits in the past four months to ensure their income is 50% of the FPL. Eligibility determinations no longer made for benefits recipients
- No asset test for SNAP for BBCE-eligible families
- After receiving 36 months of TANF assistance, families are no longer eligible for 24 months.
- Implemented the Benefits Bridge pilot program through the Department of Job and Family Services in six counties to offer a $3,000 employment retention bonus meant to help new workers cope with...
- Increased the exit income threshold for childcare subsidies to 300% of FPL with no time limit for receiving subsidies
2020-2021
- Removed the TANF asset limit; for restricted assets, allowed families to have up to $10,000 in post-secondary education accounts, home purchase or the capitalization of a small business
Economic Impact
About 146,947 working families in Ohio earn in the cliff zone. Based on a 2025 survey of benefit recipients, we estimate roughly 1 in 6 are actively limiting their earnings to protect their benefits — declining raises, refusing hours, or passing up better-paying jobs. Each family foregoes an estimated $2,100 per year. Those lost wages mean less economic activity in local communities — and benefit spending continues because families remain below eligibility thresholds. The total: an estimated $117M per year.
That figure captures only what we can measure. It doesn't capture years of stalled careers, children growing up in financial instability, or families for whom entering the workforce would mean losing more in benefits than they gain in wages.
Estimated annual cost
$117M
Modeled from survey-reported behavioral rates (CSD/Washington University 2025) and Census ACS population data. Click any row for methodology.
146,947 families × 16% avoidance × ~$2,100/yr × multiplier + benefit continuation = $117M
What this excludes: Multi-year career stagnation, health impacts of benefit loss, educational outcomes for children in families navigating benefit phase-outs, and families for whom entering the workforce would mean losing more in benefits than they gain in wages. This estimate captures only the measurable portion — the actual cost to Ohio is substantially higher. Full methodology →
Geographic Data
Explore cliff severity across Ohio’s 88 counties and 15 congressional districts. The map is shaded by CLIFF Score by default — use the tabs to switch views. Click any county to inspect, or click a second to compare. Toggle to Congressional to see district-level cliff-zone data.
Composite severity score (0–100) combining exposure, severity, vulnerability, and policy.
Click any county to inspect
| CountyCounty↕ | CLIFF ScoreScore↓ | PopulationPopulation↕ | Cliff Zone %Cliff Zone %↕ | Families at RiskFamilies↕ | Peak METRPeak METR↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harrison County | 95Severe | 14,306 | 25.1% | 846 | 215% |
| Monroe County | 91Severe | 13,227 | 23.7% | 703 | 212% |
| Guernsey County | 90Severe | 38,223 | 20.2% | 1,833 | 212% |
| Ashtabula County | 87Severe | 97,167 | 22.1% | 4,352 | 223% |
| Tuscarawas County | 87Severe | 92,385 | 17.3% | 3,471 | 215% |
| Knox County | 87Severe | 63,142 | 18.9% | 2,422 | 222% |
| Noble County | 87Severe | 14,282 | 16.8% | 385 | 212% |
| Marion County | 86Severe | 65,020 | 19.9% | 2,700 | 222% |
| Morgan County | 86Severe | 13,651 | 22.8% | 751 | 213% |
| Clark County | 85Severe | 135,158 | 19.1% | 5,835 | 219% |
| Allen County | 85Severe | 101,348 | 20.2% | 4,040 | 219% |
| Morrow County | 82Severe | 35,404 | 15.6% | 1,374 | 222% |
| Richland County | 81Severe | 125,099 | 20.1% | 4,811 | 211% |
| Muskingum County | 81Severe | 86,411 | 19.6% | 3,631 | 213% |
| Fairfield County | 79High | 163,453 | 14.6% | 5,439 | 245% |
| Belmont County | 79High | 65,473 | 18.5% | 2,863 | 212% |
| Crawford County | 79High | 41,711 | 23.5% | 2,226 | 214% |
| Coshocton County | 79High | 36,744 | 19.4% | 1,666 | 213% |
| Gallia County | 79High | 29,068 | 23.9% | 1,605 | 219% |
| Adams County | 79High | 27,540 | 24.6% | 1,683 | 212% |
Data Explorer
Interactive demographic breakdowns of Ohio’s cliff-zone population — by race, education, industry, age, and family type. Sourced from Census PUMS microdata.
Who is in Ohio’s cliff zone?
The chart below shows every person in Ohio’s cliff zone — the income range where benefit phase-outs from multiple programs overlap — broken down by who they are. Each bar is a 10-point income band (100–109% FPL, 110–119%, etc.). The colored segments show how that income band breaks down by the selected dimension.
Use Color by to switch between race, education, industry, age, family type, and other dimensions. Use Filter to focus on a specific group — single mothers, workers in a particular industry, households with children. The data table below the chart shows exact counts and percentages.
Source: Census ACS PUMS 2020–2024, individual-level records weighted to reflect the full population. This shows who is structurally exposed to cliffs based on where their income falls — not who has actually experienced a benefit loss.
Get notified when we update Ohio’s data or scoring methodology.
Get notified when we add new geographies, scoring updates, or validation results.